Objects & Boxes

A blog following the final project of BA(hons) Photographic Art student, Daryl Wood.

This project explores themes of objectification, de-personalisation, ownership and identification, whilst encouraging mass participation from you - the viewer - in an attempt to understand why these issues play such a huge role in modern society.

links

tumblinks

search

powered by tumblr
seattle theme by parker ehret

  1. Thought I would reblog my entry into the “Best of Britain” competition. Postcards entered by artists from all over the world will be on display at the Corinium Museum in Cirencester from Friday 4th May, alongside memorabilia from the Queen’s coronation as part of the Diamond Jubilee celebrations.
bestofbritainsubmissions:

Daryl Wood

    Thought I would reblog my entry into the “Best of Britain” competition. Postcards entered by artists from all over the world will be on display at the Corinium Museum in Cirencester from Friday 4th May, alongside memorabilia from the Queen’s coronation as part of the Diamond Jubilee celebrations.

    bestofbritainsubmissions:

    Daryl Wood

     
     
  2. hitrecordjoe:

Points worth considering re: the Kony debate…

rtnt:

RTNT On The Problems With KONY 2012
The deluge of social media attention that has been given to the simplistic KONY 2012 campaign and the surrounding haze of misinformation has reaffirmed our purpose at Read This, Not That. Joseph Kony is a warlord and a monster - this much cannot be denied. The present controversy swirls not around Kony himself, but rather around the substance of the campaign, and the intentions of the organization behind it: Invisible Children.
Conversations are raging across the web between supporters and detractors - conversations that suffer, in many instances, from a lack of understanding about the current state of Uganda and of Kony’s Lord’s Resistance Army (details of which are notably lacking from the film.)
There has been much resistance to criticism of the campaign, resistance founded in knee-jerk reactions meant to defend the perceived good intentions of Invisible Children. The appearance of a noble cause to mask questionable action is not anomalous in our world. As such, it is our responsibility to be skeptical, especially when engaged with propagandistic media that aims to affect us emotionally and prompt a very specific reaction: in this case, to give money to Invisible Children.
Our effort here is to offer articles that inform the debate surrounding KONY 2012 and to encourage everyone to embrace critical conversation, even when that gaze is directed at what appear to be good intentions. Things are rarely as simple as they are made out to be, and we can be sure that the state of Uganda and the LRA is not as simple as the KONY 2012 campaign makes it seem.
Michael Wilkerson, writing for Foreign Policy, asks what the video is meant to accomplish:

So the goal is to make sure that President Obama doesn’t withdraw the advisors he deployed until Kony is captured or killed. That seems noble enough, except that there has been no mention by the government of withdrawing those forces — at least any I can find. Does anyone else have any evidence about this urgent threat of cancellation? One that justifies such a massive production campaign and surely lucrative donation drive?

TMS Ruge, writing for Project Diaspora, pleads with us to respect the agency of Ugandans:

This IC campaign is a perfect example of how fund-sucking NGO’s survive…They are, in actuality, selling themselves as the issue, as the subject, as the panacea for everything that ails me as the agency-devoid African. All I have to do is show up in my broken English, look pathetic and wanting. You, my dear social media savvy click-activist, will shed a tear, exhaust Facebook’s like button, mobilize your cadre of equally ill-uninformed netizens to throw money at the problem.

Ugandan Journalist Angelo Izama, writing at This Is Africa, finds KONY 2012’s portrayal of Uganda outdated:

To call the campaign a misrepresentation is an understatement. While it draws attention to the fact that Kony, indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court in 2005, is still on the loose, it’s portrayal of his alleged crimes in Northern Uganda are from a bygone era.

Musa Okwanga, writing for The Independent, discusses the complexities the video left out:

What the narrator also failed to do was mention to his son that when a bad guy like Kony is running riot for years on end, raping and slashing and seizing and shooting, then there is most likely another host of bad guys out there letting him get on with it.  He probably should have told him that, too.

Guy Gunartne, writing for Codoc, questions the wisdom of Invisible Children’s preferred policy of military intervention:

The LRA is reported to be 90% made up of abducted children – military defeat would mean engaging in combat and targeting of the very victims of this war; these children are the LRA.

The author of Visible Children examines the armies on the other side of the war:

Both the Ugandan army and Sudan People’s Liberation Army are riddled with accusations of rape and looting, but Invisible Children defends them, arguing that the Ugandan army is “better equipped than that of any of the other affected countries”, although Kony is no longer active in Uganda and hasn’t been since 2006 by their own admission.

Glenna Gordon, who took the photograph above, takes issue with the filmmakers’ self-aggrandizement in this interview for The Washington Post:

People who have lived there for years, bona fide aid workers who have studied foreign policy and other relevant fields like public health, who are really there because they are trying to solve problems — they see Invisible Children as trying to promote themselves and a version of the narrative. 

Eric Ritskes, writing at Wanderings, reminds us that it is not about us:

It falls into the trap, the belief that the problem is ignorance and the answer is education. When we tell more people about Kony and the LRA, something WILL happen. It’s not true…More education does not change the systems and structures of oppression, those that need Africa to be the place of suffering and war and saving…We need to learn: It’s not about us.

Patrick Wegner, writing at Justice in Conflict, offers some final thoughts:

To conclude, the Kony 2012 campaign is a reminder why we should see advocacy campaigns to interfere in conflicts with some scepticism, no matter how good the cause…. It also challenges us to think of ways how to design advocacy campaigns that mobilise many people without dumbing down the problem and its purported solution.

We put in a lot of work reading, reviewing, compiling, and excerpting these pieces for you, and hope you will consider them in this debate. - The RTNT TeamFollow Read This, Not That on Tumblr / Facebook / Twitter 

    hitrecordjoe:

    Points worth considering re: the Kony debate…

    rtnt:

    RTNT On The Problems With KONY 2012

    The deluge of social media attention that has been given to the simplistic KONY 2012 campaign and the surrounding haze of misinformation has reaffirmed our purpose at Read This, Not That. Joseph Kony is a warlord and a monster - this much cannot be denied. The present controversy swirls not around Kony himself, but rather around the substance of the campaign, and the intentions of the organization behind it: Invisible Children.

    Conversations are raging across the web between supporters and detractors - conversations that suffer, in many instances, from a lack of understanding about the current state of Uganda and of Kony’s Lord’s Resistance Army (details of which are notably lacking from the film.)

    There has been much resistance to criticism of the campaign, resistance founded in knee-jerk reactions meant to defend the perceived good intentions of Invisible Children. The appearance of a noble cause to mask questionable action is not anomalous in our world. As such, it is our responsibility to be skeptical, especially when engaged with propagandistic media that aims to affect us emotionally and prompt a very specific reaction: in this case, to give money to Invisible Children.

    Our effort here is to offer articles that inform the debate surrounding KONY 2012 and to encourage everyone to embrace critical conversation, even when that gaze is directed at what appear to be good intentions. Things are rarely as simple as they are made out to be, and we can be sure that the state of Uganda and the LRA is not as simple as the KONY 2012 campaign makes it seem.

    Michael Wilkerson, writing for Foreign Policy, asks what the video is meant to accomplish:

    So the goal is to make sure that President Obama doesn’t withdraw the advisors he deployed until Kony is captured or killed. That seems noble enough, except that there has been no mention by the government of withdrawing those forces — at least any I can find. Does anyone else have any evidence about this urgent threat of cancellation? One that justifies such a massive production campaign and surely lucrative donation drive?

    TMS Ruge, writing for Project Diaspora, pleads with us to respect the agency of Ugandans:

    This IC campaign is a perfect example of how fund-sucking NGO’s survive…They are, in actuality, selling themselves as the issue, as the subject, as the panacea for everything that ails me as the agency-devoid African. All I have to do is show up in my broken English, look pathetic and wanting. You, my dear social media savvy click-activist, will shed a tear, exhaust Facebook’s like button, mobilize your cadre of equally ill-uninformed netizens to throw money at the problem.

    Ugandan Journalist Angelo Izama, writing at This Is Africa, finds KONY 2012’s portrayal of Uganda outdated:

    To call the campaign a misrepresentation is an understatement. While it draws attention to the fact that Kony, indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court in 2005, is still on the loose, it’s portrayal of his alleged crimes in Northern Uganda are from a bygone era.

    Musa Okwanga, writing for The Independent, discusses the complexities the video left out:

    What the narrator also failed to do was mention to his son that when a bad guy like Kony is running riot for years on end, raping and slashing and seizing and shooting, then there is most likely another host of bad guys out there letting him get on with it.  He probably should have told him that, too.

    Guy Gunartne, writing for Codoc, questions the wisdom of Invisible Children’s preferred policy of military intervention:

    The LRA is reported to be 90% made up of abducted children – military defeat would mean engaging in combat and targeting of the very victims of this war; these children are the LRA.

    The author of Visible Children examines the armies on the other side of the war:

    Both the Ugandan army and Sudan People’s Liberation Army are riddled with accusations of rape and looting, but Invisible Children defends them, arguing that the Ugandan army is “better equipped than that of any of the other affected countries”, although Kony is no longer active in Uganda and hasn’t been since 2006 by their own admission.

    Glenna Gordon, who took the photograph above, takes issue with the filmmakers’ self-aggrandizement in this interview for The Washington Post:

    People who have lived there for years, bona fide aid workers who have studied foreign policy and other relevant fields like public health, who are really there because they are trying to solve problems — they see Invisible Children as trying to promote themselves and a version of the narrative. 

    Eric Ritskes, writing at Wanderings, reminds us that it is not about us:

    It falls into the trap, the belief that the problem is ignorance and the answer is education. When we tell more people about Kony and the LRA, something WILL happen. It’s not true…More education does not change the systems and structures of oppression, those that need Africa to be the place of suffering and war and saving…We need to learn: It’s not about us.

    Patrick Wegner, writing at Justice in Conflict, offers some final thoughts:

    To conclude, the Kony 2012 campaign is a reminder why we should see advocacy campaigns to interfere in conflicts with some scepticism, no matter how good the cause…. It also challenges us to think of ways how to design advocacy campaigns that mobilise many people without dumbing down the problem and its purported solution.

    We put in a lot of work reading, reviewing, compiling, and excerpting these pieces for you, and hope you will consider them in this debate.

     - The RTNT Team

    Follow Read This, Not That on Tumblr / Facebook / Twitter 

     
     
  3. Happy International Women’s Day! Not much left of it now, but thought I ought to do something to mark it. This is potentially the beginnings of a new project, continuing with similar themes to those I touched on in my dissertation and graduate project. Nothing solid just yet, but a few ideas floating around…

    Happy International Women’s Day! Not much left of it now, but thought I ought to do something to mark it. This is potentially the beginnings of a new project, continuing with similar themes to those I touched on in my dissertation and graduate project. Nothing solid just yet, but a few ideas floating around…

     
     
  4. Strangely, this is from late 2010, around the time when I first started planning out exactly what I would produce for my final project, but I am seeing it for the first time today. Bizarre!

     
     
  5. Couldn’t resist reposting…

    hitrecordjoe:

    hellogiggles:

    What are you doing New Years Eve? From Zooey Deschanel & HitRECordJOE. Go to HelloGiggles for a fun video surprise!

    :O)

     
     
  6. I love this project! I was actually brought here because I wrote a piece that was posted on The F Bomb ("My Body Is") and you linked to this Tumblr in your comment. Anyway, just wanted to drop you a line to tell you that your photo project is fascinating. Where do you study, if you don't mind my asking?
    answer:

    Crazy! Thank you very much, I really liked your piece and thought it was very relevant to the direction of my work, so I hope you don’t mind me reposting it! I have just graduated from the University of Wales, Newport. Thanks again! x

     
     
  7. I’ve been meaning to post this for a very long time now, but always seemed to have something else to be doing. Finally, here is the installation shot of my work in the Graduation exhibition.

    I’ve been meaning to post this for a very long time now, but always seemed to have something else to be doing. Finally, here is the installation shot of my work in the Graduation exhibition.

     
     
  8. Coming to an end.

    So, hand-in and final assessment are now over and done with, at long last. I genuinely have no idea how the assessment went, except that I didn’t cry this time, so I can only assume it went better than the last one? But as I said, I really could not tell. Fingers crossed it was ok, and if it wasn’t then hopefully the grades should all average out…. Thank fook I got a 1st in the dissertation!! That should certainly help to balance things out a bit. To accompany the final practical piece, I handed in a “Project Diary”, which was adapted from this blog and expanded upon. That diary totalled over 13600 words, so I’m pretty pleased with that in itself! I guess we shall see what happens… Now all that remains is grad show and publication, which both seem to be out our hands, so just sit back and wait…

     
     
  9. "

    What’s the point of popular?

    You’d think that it’s the most important thing in the world. Homecoming queen, student body president, the most Facebook friends, Oscar winner, how many people are waiting in line at the book signing…

    Popular is almost never a measure of impact, or genius, or art. Popular rarely correlates with guts, hard work or a willingness to lead (and be willing to be wrong along the way).

    I’ll grant you that being popular (at least on one day in November) is a great way to get elected President. But in general, the search for popular is wildly overrated, because it corrupts our work, eats away at our art and makes it likely we’ll compromise to please the anonymous masses.

    Worth considering is the value of losing school elections and other popularity contests. Losing reminds you that the opinion of unaffiliated strangers is worthless. They don’t know you, they’re not interested in what you have to offer and you can discover that their rejection actually means nothing. It will empower you to even bigger things in the future…

    When you focus on delighting an audience you care about, you strip the masses of their power.

    "
    — Seth Godin, Seth’s Blog
     
     
  10. Kurt is great have read everyone of his books. What book is the quote from?
    asked by irockphotos
    answer:

    My apologies for taking absolutely forever to respond to you! The quote is from A Man Without A Country, which is a series of short essays. I had originally re-blogged the quote from someone else, as I felt it was very relevant to my project at that point. I honestly can’t say I was particularly familiar with his work beforehand - I was aware of him, but have since decided that I need to do a little further reading!